yes
0% |
0% (0 votes)
OK now cars consume 25% of our corn crop. This in the form of ethanol made from corn. Hey, I'm gonna hafta take my car to an AA meeting. It's addicted to the great taste of corn.
0% |
0% (0 votes)
While we’re fighting biofuels, we remember that we need to to promote solutions that aren’t business as usual. That means consuming less fossil fuel, (buy local, grow your own food) reducing our energy usage, get wind and solar energy wholly viable and on grid, and promote proven transportation alternatives – like plug-ins, public transportation and pedal power.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
Biofuels are a much better option than fosil fuels, but it's still not good, and we can do much better.For example:
Sugar is bad, artificial sweeteners are much better but they are also very bad too. Although Biofuels are improving, it doesn't make it good enough. Foolish!
0% |
0% (0 votes)
Biofuels raise food prices and add to the starvation problem. There are much better alternatives - solar, wind, geothermal, hydrogen, you name it.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
I believe there is a place for biofuels in our society, however the feedstock and or the process in which the feedstock is produced must be better controlled. An interesting article from the April 11th, 2009 Economist reports a supporting theory of "biofools", but with further research there is also a case for continued production. I am still FOR biofuels as a part of the solution. http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13437705
0% |
0% (0 votes)
i think that the biofuels are going to destroy the cultivable fields of the third world countrys like argentina, the place where i live. A possible solution for this problem is to develop better power sources such as solar energy or eolic energy.
My inglish isn's very good but i only want to express this opinion that match whit the opinion of a lot of people in my country.
0% |
0% (0 votes)
After 25 years of subsidies biofuel still can't survive on it's own. If biofuel made economic sense it wouldn't have to be subsidized.
Let's subsidize biofuel research but stop subsidizing commercial production that is neither economically nor environmentally sustatinable.
0% |
0% (0 votes)
http://www.hoppingmad.com.au
Website Design - Web page Design Website Designer Sydney Australia
Our website design firm Sydney, expertise in website design, web design, web designer, website designer. A range of web page designs Sydney Australia.
At Hopping mad designs, all our graphic and writing skills and specialist IT knowledge is geared to follow these rules to deliver a web site that not only looks terrific, but also sells your business, products and services.
Hemp makes the most efficient biofuel and consumes no food resources.
bio fuel is an excellent energy source. it is absolutely free from pollution because tree takes its co2 from atmosphere at the time of photosynthesis and the same stored quantity of co2 is drawn in the atmosphere in the combustion of bio fuel.thats y there is no chance for co2 increment in the atmosphere...
<a href=http://www.picktorrent.com> http://www.picktorrent.com </a>
http://www.sigmainfotech.com.au/websitedesign.htm
Website Design - Web page Design Website Designer Sydney Australia
Our website design firm Sydney, expertise in website design, web design, web designer, website designer. A range of web page designs Sydney Australia.
At Sigma InfoTech, all our graphic and writing skills and specialist IT knowledge is geared to follow these rules to deliver a web site that not only looks terrific, but also sells your business, products and services.
its all good when we all back to nature, nature knows what best for us if we ever give a damn about it. so bio fuels indeed
Bio - Doesn't means food...
I guess Human don't eat all kind of things available in nature...
We have a knowledge to do "Research". So Let's do it. and find something that doesn't alter the food web- nature.
At least its better than Fossil fuels and more over do we have a choice? No!!!