i think that the biofuels are going to destroy the cultivable fields of the third world countrys like argentina, the place where i live. A possible solution for this problem is to develop better power sources such as solar energy or eolic energy.
My inglish isn's very good but i only want to express this opinion that match whit the opinion of a lot of people in my country.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
After 25 years of subsidies biofuel still can't survive on it's own. If biofuel made economic sense it wouldn't have to be subsidized.
Let's subsidize biofuel research but stop subsidizing commercial production that is neither economically nor environmentally sustatinable.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
Bio fuels are definitely not a much better option than renewable energy as it is again just another source of carbon dioxide emission.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
I am against biofuel. I believe it's better to used the food to feed people than to convert it to fuel cars.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
Most people seem to be ignorant of the fact that bio fuels also release Carbon dioxide. Solar, wind and nuclear energy hold key to the future as they do not release Carbon dioxide!
100% |
0% (1 votes)
While I'm not an expert on the subject, burning any fuel produces CO2. I wouldn't expect biofuel usage to make any positive impact on the cumulative CO2 emissions. This combined with the huge land area required makes me think that we should keep looking if we want to ween our dependency on fossil fuels.
0% |
100% (1 votes)
To replace gasoline in the USA alone, we would have to grow corn on every square inch of the earth.If our world is to survive, we have two choices:
1) Nuclear power
2) Wind power
Storage becomes the expensive issue. However, with Ammonia the separation of Hydrogen from Oxygen becomes less energy expensive. This allows us to convert the electricity from either of the above sources into a liquid,renewable, transportable resource. Don't fucking argue. I'm a Ph.D chemist and I'm right.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
Biofuels could be wise...but not by the current way it's being generated. Government subsidies are pushing bio fuels too fast and are inflating the price of food. We were too quick to create fuel from renewable crops, it's created a problem that is very hard to change. There are different crops that can be harvested and energy extracted using enzymatic techniques, but we must wait until this is perfected before bio fuels are explored any further.
100% |
0% (1 votes)
its all good when we all back to nature, nature knows what best for us if we ever give a damn about it. so bio fuels indeed
Bio - Doesn't means food...
I guess Human don't eat all kind of things available in nature...
We have a knowledge to do "Research". So Let's do it. and find something that doesn't alter the food web- nature.
At least its better than Fossil fuels and more over do we have a choice? No!!!
Biofuels may sound strange why this Bio had been to this fuel also but even after introducing unleaded petrol many problems like Globalwarming.,health issues increasing and dam waste products are increasing like anything,,As a 3R practise Reduce.,Reuse.,Recycle and overcome bags of problem let it sound friedly Our Biofuel,,..///
yes i am voting for too.
Wise only if it is made of algae from marine agriculture - onland green ponds - that also contribute to the Oxigen emission and reduce of Carbon green house gasses.
I completely support it, for the sake of our planet! Go biofuel.
The oil companies are taking advantage of hard working people, like you and myself.
We have a oppurtunity to break free from the hands that control us and be apart of something that will benifit the rest of humanity.
I urge all of you to research biofuels more before passing judgment on something that can not only be the energy source of the future, but a by product food source as well.